Thinking Only Of The Milestone Isn’t Enough

I saw two excellent movies this weekend. The first was Lincoln and the second was 42. Both dealt with racism. (I was thinking to round out the story I needed to watch Armistad 🙂

Lincoln was very good and Daniel Day-Lewis was excellent. The other actor I thought did an incredible job was Tommy Lee Jones as Thaddeus Lewis, the ardent abolitionist and Congressman. In general I thought the movie was well done except the ending. The movie covered the period of Lincoln’s presidency dealing with the passage of the 13th amendment that abolishes slavery and the end of the Civil War. These issues were intertwined. Spielberg tacked on Lincoln’s death and a speech at the end, which I thought diminished the movie. It should have ended a scene or two before, with Lincoln walking down the steps at the White House.

42 was excellent. The acting was superb and the writers/director did an excellent job of summing up the story. 42 covers the period of time where Jackie Robinson is “drafted” by the Dodgers through his first full season in the Major Leagues. To start, I easily rate it one of the best baseball movies ever. 42, though, is more than just a baseball movie and Robinson was more than just a baseball player. Jackie Robinson, really, was the beginning of the end for Jim Crow and segregation.

What I couldn’t stop thinking about through both of these movies was something asked of one of the black housekeepers in Lincoln. To paraphrase, the question was, what happens once you have your freedom? And the reply was, we’ve thought so long about freedom we haven’t thought about what to do with it. It struck me that by the time Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier, this was still not answered because of Jim Crow, almost 100 years later.

This led me to think about role models and how we each build ourselves, how we know where we come from and what we stand for. And I couldn’t help but wonder what is next, in our modern times, for our communities. The trials are clear: high unemployment, children born without two parents. How different would our world be today if those leaders could have thought about what to do with their freedom?

I don’t mean to only harp on societal issues, though. It also made me think about work. I think a lot of us in start-up land fall into this trap. It isn’t good enough to just think about release or funding or whatever that next big milestone is. It is critical to think about what we are going to do with it, how we are going to build the organization, and what qualities we want to instill in it.

Tenacity And Persistence Pays Off

From Fred Wilson:

I have known Scott Heiferman since the late 90s. He was one of the early NYC web 1.0 entrepreneurs. We were quite friendly with Scott but we were not early investors inMeetup, the company Scott started right after 9/11. Scott and I were at an event together and when asked about something he replied that he viewed Meetup as “a twenty year project.” He said that it would take at least twenty years for Meetup to achieve all that he wanted from it and possibly a lot longer. And that he was patient and committed to that timeline.

As Fred commented, Meetup is in its second decade and just passed its one hundred millionth booking. It seems that Meetup has been part of the web since there was a web. It has weathered many competitors. I have a ton of respect for people that have a dream, a vision, and stick to it for years and years. Congratulations to Scott Heiferman and the Meetup team.

Backlog

I’ve accumulated a number of really good posts that I never seem to get around to posting. I thought, instead of sharing them one at a time, that I will share them in a group here instead:

I have been influenced greatly by each of these articles. In particular the last two, Subcompact Publishing and Augmented Paper, are amazing treaties on the future and design, respectively. Hope you take the time to read them all.

Virality For The Win

Virality is a funny thing. It’s like catching lightening in a bottle.  Very few do it but those that do catch the bullet train. So I am always fascinated by the “science” of virality and studies on the topic.

It’s one depressingly typical minute of the 6.2 million uploaded to YouTube every day: In a Montreal park, nothing much is happening. The camera pans around a clear blue sky, tracing the arc of a golden eagle as it twists and turns through the air. The bird pulls a generous sweep around a large tree, 30 feet or more, shorn of its branches by the bitter frost that hits the Quebec city this time of year. And then things turn from dull nature documentary into snuff film.

The eagle doesn’t continue its elegant acrobatics. Instead, it suddenly picks up pace. The sweep becomes a swoop, and it’s dropping altitude. Eleven seconds into the video, a small boy in a warm insulated jacket comes into frame. He’s sitting faced away, staring into space.

Eleven seconds into the video, you realize what’s going to happen. Eleven seconds into the video, the eagle is 10 feet behind the little boy, and you’re damned if the way the bird’s wings are drawn up doesn’t remind you an awful lot of the way Dracula wraps himself in his cloak before biting. It’s horror-movie stuff.

Except none of it is real. A great read for this weekend.